Bestech's Sam

Case Study #6 – Eurocodes Compared with BS5400
for Prestressed Beam Design

Sam logo


Designing with Eurocodes.

The mandatory pan-European switch from local design codes to Eurocodes is now very close. The availability of software for the new design codes has always been acknowledged as a key factor in the implementation of the change.

Bestech has been working for over four years adapting its popular and unique SAM bridge loading, analysis and design software, and most of the modules are now available for Eurocodes. This case study looks at the design of a typical simple bridge and gives some insight into the differences that bridge engineers will encounter.


The Bridge

A simple concrete bridge deck was designed to the British design code BS 5400, and then to the Eurocodes using the UK National Annexes, and the differences evaluated, both in terms of the resulting design, and the design process.

The deck comprises two 20m spans with a 25° skew, made continuous over its central support carrying a single carriageway, and constructed with UK standard Y3 beams at 1m centres. For simplicity and brevity this short review considers only the Serviceability Limit State bending design.


The differences summarised.


The Actions

The BS 5400 beam is designed for a live load sagging moment of 384kNm and hogging moment of 328kNm. The Eurocodes beam is designed for a variable load characteristic sagging moment of 511kNm (383kNm frequent) and characteristic hogging moment of 387kNm ( 289kNm frequent).


The Design process.

There are two principal differences in the design process for this bridge.

Firstly, using BS 5400 it is necessary to check the design both for combination 1 and for combination 3 (thermal effects included) whereas to the Eurocodes the traffic and thermal effects are checked in a single process. Although the process itself is more complex, the use of software makes it simpler overall.

The second principal difference is that the concrete properties (strength at transfer, creep, shrinkage etc) are all calculated within the program from expressions (given by the Eurocodes), rather than estimated and specified as data (by BS 5400). This introduces a significant additional amount of calculation, but again, with software tools the only impact for the engineer is the time to review the calculation output. In this case there are 420 lines of calculations for the BS design, and 550 lines for the Eurocodes design.

Using the software tools therefore, the design process is very similar, taking a similar amount of time despite the added complexity of the calculations.

As may be expected, resulting from the fact that the physics are independent of the design code, the serviceability limit state still controls the bending design for this type of bridge deck. However, whereas for BS 5400 the tension limit is controlled by stress, in the Eurocodes the tension limit is controlled by either decompression or crack width, and here an additional complication is introduced by the fact that a lower level of loading is applied for these checks than for the compression limit.


The Structure

Fig 1. SLS Stress Results for BS 5400 Design for Load Combination 1

Fig 2. SLS Stress Results for Eurocode Design with Frequent combination of actions

In both cases the traffic loading controls the design rather than thermal effects. For the BS 5400 design, 19 tendons are required, and for the Eurocode design, 17 tendons are required. Each tendon contributes approximately 0.65MPa to the average concrete stress in this example. The difference in the number of tendons arises from the increased jacking force allowed by the Eurocodes, and from the differences in default values for creep and shrinkage suggested by BS 5400. When these parameters are matched, both designs give the same number of tendons. This suggests, as might be expected, that the BS 5400 default values are conservative.


Recommendations.

The principal area where engineers new to the Eurocodes will find most unfamiliarity in use is in the combinations of actions using EN 1990 and EN 1991-2. Most experienced engineers coming to this fresh will most likely spend a week getting to understand it, and then making mistakes. Even just a half day of training can result in a far better and more reliable understanding, and cannot be recommended highly enough.

The second main recommendation is to make responsible use of the embedded knowledge and training help that is available in software. Whilst becoming familiar, every single item of data should be appraised, using on-line help which gives references to the relevant code clauses, and similarly every line of calculations printout (which also makes use of the copious references to the code clauses) should be critically reviewed.